Skip to main content
Discuss your scope
32 control templates · 4 categories

Operated ITGC testing that produces a reviewer-ready workpaper.

We operate the testing workflow end-to-end across 32 ITGC control templates, draft conclusions with AI under full provenance, and hand your engagement team a single integrated HTML workpaper plus two CSV side-exports. Your licensed auditor reviews every determination, accepts or overrides, and signs. We issue no opinion, assurance, or attestation — the professional judgment is yours.

§ 01   What a managed engagement hands your team

Every engagement produces these artifacts

Each is re-derivable from primary evidence, and in every case your licensed auditor reviews, accepts or overrides, and signs. We operate the workflow and produce documentation; we do not conclude.

Managed-engagement deliverables
WP13-section HTML workpaper · CSV-pivotable evidence index · browser-print-to-PDF for archive; subject to auditor professional judgment
CSVEvidence Index (10 columns incl. SHA-256 file hash) + Testing Results (12 columns incl. AI result, confidence, auditor decision, model) — RFC 4180, UTF-8 BOM, CRLF
POPPopulation analysis + risk-based sampling from AICPA AU-C 530 attribute tables, reconstructable from a stored seed
AIAI test results — extracted facts, evidence excerpts, confidence scores, per-attribute rationale; every result reviewed and accepted or overridden before lock
EXCException log with severity, root cause, SLA tracking, and remediation status
QC6 control-level reviews + 29 per-sample data-integrity check types; critical/high findings acknowledged before sign-off
§ 02   How it runs

Managed delivery, end to end

We operate the testing workflow and produce the workpapers as a service: population, sampling, evidence mapping, AI testing, QC, and exception tracking — and deliver the reviewer-ready workpaper plus CSVs. Your licensed auditor reviews, concludes, and signs. Single-auditor architecture: one operating user per engagement, no preparer/reviewer teaming required.

We are the platform operator, not your auditor — we produce documentation; we do not issue opinions, assurance, or attestation. The licensed auditor's conclusion is always the authoritative gate.

§ 03   The control library

32 ITGC control templates across four categories

The library is the catalog — the controls in scope are defined per engagement, not all 32 by default. Count reads from the source, never hard-coded.

Access · 11
Access control templates
A1User Provisioning Approvals
A2User Terminations Timeliness
A3Privileged Access Grant & Justification
A4Privileged Access Periodic Review
A5Break-Glass Emergency Access
A6User Access Reviews (UAR)
A7Service Accounts Lifecycle
A8Authentication Controls
A9Cloud IAM Policy and Identity Review
A10MFA Enrollment and Resilience
A11Third-Party / Sub-processor Risk Review
Change · 5
Change management control templates
C1Normal Change Approvals
C2Emergency Changes
C3Release Controls
C4CI/CD Pipeline Controls
C5Configuration/IaC Changes
Security · 6
Security control templates
S1Security Event Logging
S2Segregation of Duties
S3Vulnerability Management
S4Access Review Authorization
S5Encryption Key Management
S6AI-Governance Controls
Operations · 10
IT operations control templates
O1Backup Success Monitoring
O2Restore Testing
O3Batch Job Monitoring
O4Monitoring & Alert Response
O5Incident Management
O6Problem Management
O7Patch Management
O8Logging & Audit Log Review
O9DR/BCP Testing
O10Backup Immutability and Ransomware Readiness
§ 04   Six newer control areas

Added to the library — A9, A10, A11, O10, S5, S6

A9

Cloud IAM Policy and Identity Review

IAM provisioning, role drift, service-principal hygiene, and federated-identity controls across AWS / Azure / GCP.

A10

MFA Enrollment and Resilience

Enrollment coverage at the appropriate strength tier, exception tracking, and challenge-bypass conditions across the in-scope population.

A11

Third-Party / Sub-processor Risk Review

Onboarding due-diligence, ongoing monitoring, and contract-renewal triggers.

O10

Backup Immutability and Ransomware Readiness

Immutability + isolation of backup tiers, restore validation, and ransomware-readiness drills (optional per engagement).

S5

Encryption Key Management

FIPS-validated key storage, rotation cadence, separation-of-duties on key administration, and audit logging.

S6

AI-Governance Controls

Model inventory, prompt-injection guardrails, human-review gates, and data-leakage controls (includes an informational EU AI Act attribute, non-scored for US engagements).

§ 05   AI testing

AI tests every sample against every attribute — and never finalizes

Evidence-first by design: no mapped evidence = INCONCLUSIVE; an empty fact value = FAIL, never an assumed PASS. Full provenance per result — extracted facts, evidence excerpts, rationale, evidence IDs, model used, and a 0–100% confidence score. Per-category confidence thresholds (Access 75%, Change 80%, Operations 75%, Security 85%) with higher bulk-accept floors. A tenant-keyed circuit breaker isolates one tenant's failures from another's. Sign-off is blocked unless every AI result is reviewed and accepted or overridden.

Inference runs on Anthropic Claude (US); per Anthropic's commercial terms your evidence is not used for model training, and Anthropic retains API request logs for 7 days per those terms.

§ 06   Why the methodology stays defensible

Gates that can’t be skipped

Reproducible SHA-256-seeded sampling, an immutable audit trail, and ten distinct named sign-off gates ensure a reviewer can re-derive every conclusion from primary evidence.

  1. GATE 01Testing complete
  2. GATE 02Quality review run
  3. GATE 03Critical QC findings acknowledged
  4. GATE 04High QC findings acknowledged
  5. GATE 05All AI results reviewed
  6. GATE 06Every attribute tested (PCAOB AS 2110.20-22)
  7. GATE 07No rejected AI results outstanding
  8. GATE 08Exceptions closed or accepted
  9. GATE 09SLA-overdue critical/high exceptions resolved
  10. GATE 10Change-control traceability complete

Locked until every gate passes

Plus a ≥80% testing-coverage blocker and a no-sample-without-evidence blocker. Hard blockers are separated from acknowledgeable warnings.

§ 07   Tenant isolation & integrity

Isolation, evidence integrity, and an immutable trail

Row-Level Security enforces session-bound tenant isolation on all 22 tables, backed by application-layer filters; cross-tenant access returns 404 (not 403) so existence isn't leaked. Evidence files are SHA-256 hashed and served only through authenticated, tenant-verified download proxies. Append-only audit trail, immutable by trigger. US-hosted: Vercel iad1, Neon US.

Describes implemented mechanics; not a certification or compliance attestation.


We also build custom audit-workflow platforms for other streams.


On the same tenant-isolated, append-only-audit architecture. A portfolio of capability — no outcome, certification, or compliance guarantee. No reference build for another audit stream has shipped yet.

See these capabilities in a real workpaper

Browse a sample workpaper produced by the platform — same controls, same methodology, same output format — or discuss a managed engagement.