End-to-end ITGC audit automation — from evidence to reviewer-ready workpapers
Whether you're a CPA firm testing client controls, an IT auditor inside a corporate internal audit function, or an IT audit consultant on contract — this platform automates the full ITGC audit workflow. 32 control templates, AI-powered evidence testing, automated quality review, and 13-section workpaper export. From $1,499/month.
60+ automated quality checks
Automated quality review runs 60+ check types — from self-approval detection to SoD violation tracking to SLA breach monitoring. Critical and high-severity findings must be acknowledged before sign-off.
11 sign-off validation gates
The platform blocks sign-off until all gates pass: testing complete, QC acknowledged, AI results reviewed, exceptions resolved, evidence linked, coverage thresholds met. No shortcuts.
AI-powered evidence testing
AI evaluates each sample against each control attribute with full provenance — model, confidence score, evidence excerpts, and rationale. Evidence-first design: no evidence means inconclusive; all AI outputs require professional auditor review before sign-off.
Why this is a platform, not a spreadsheet
- Reproducible sampling
- Sign-off gates
- Audit trail
- AI review & override
- SHA-256 hashes
The platform
Purpose-built ITGC testing platform that enforces consistent methodology across every workpaper. Not spreadsheets — structured workflow with built-in quality gates.
- AI tests run only on samples with mapped evidence; controls cannot be concluded without an evidence-grounded test result
- Risk-based sampling per AICPA AU-C 530 and PCAOB AS 2315 — random, stratified, or judgmental with SHA-256 seeded reproducibility
- 60+ automated quality checks (self-approval, SoD violation, post-termination activity, SLA breach, and more)
- 13-section professional workpaper export (HTML; print-to-PDF in browser for archive)
- Structured for PCAOB AS 1215 documentation requirements
- Example ROI: $75,000/year — pricing page shows the per-engagement math (2 auditors × 15 hrs × $250/hr × 10 engagements)
Why auditors switch from spreadsheets
Spreadsheets don't enforce methodology, can't reproduce results, and leave reviewers guessing how conclusions were reached.
- Hours saved per control — example scenario: $75K/year on 10 engagements (2 auditors × 15 hrs × $250/hr; see pricing for the math)
- Consistent output — enforced methodology means consistent structure across workpapers
- Full audit trail — every conclusion linked to evidence, every action logged
- Your data, your tenant — dedicated tenant isolation; mutual NDA available on request as part of scoping
See it in action
Browse a sample workpaper produced by the platform, or tell us about your ITGC scope.